RE: Why not Jamiroquai?


Michael Aregood (maregood@comcastpc.com)
Fri, 22 Oct 1999 14:37:45 -0400



The slamming of Jamiroquai might be put a bit more in context by some of the
past threads on this list that were beaten into the ground. I think one of
them ended up discussing "acid-jazzer" footwear!

aRgo

-----Original Message-----
From: Josep Flix [mailto:jflix@ifae.es]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 1:24 PM
To: NRahav@ixl.com; tunde@arches.uga.edu; calvin@hklink.net
Cc: elson@westworld.com; jason.mariyappan@ic.ac.uk; NRahav@ixl.com;
acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
Subject: Why not Jamiroquai?

N·a·t
>funny too that you say this because you were the one who slammed some new
>jack for asking about Jamiroquai. (though I have to admit that was funny)

BAO
> ALl music is good to talk about, but its just a bit weird.

Umm... I don't understand why you have to slam questions about Jamiroquai...
I was introduced into the AcidJazz World by hearing the first album of
Jamiroquai. Yes... It's true! and I think it's a good AcidJazz album!. (Also
I have to say the style of Jamiroquia has changed a lot!).

Then... How you have to fight with people which is interested on Jamiroquai?
Remember that on this list people talk about hip hop, house, funk, rare
groove, jazz, "acid" jazz, reggae, african, indian, d&b....

So, Why not Jamiroquai?

Pepe.
______________________________________________________

Josep Flix Molina Institut de Física d'Altes Energies
E-mail: jflix@ifae.es GSM - 649 81 56 53
Short Messages at GSM E-mail: 649815653@correo.movistar.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Oct 22 1999 - 20:53:33 MET DST