Re: Re: 80s and the BOC thread!

From: leslie shill (icehouse@redshift.com)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 03:51:57 CET

  • Next message: Pedro Cevallos: "Re: Boards of Canada pedophilia charge..."

    The reason I wrote back and copied the list is that I believe in keeping
    things transparent when an attack is involved and it obviously was since you
    apologized! I do understand something about list ethics and usually keep the
    real flames to myself but since I was talking about music I felt the
    response online was justified. Anyway, now it is histoire! perhaps YOU
    should be the one chillin! Get into the BOC thread about pedophiles, I think
    that to make even a sideways comment about a subject like this is
    potentially dangerous and ugly rumours get started in this way, since the
    commentary on this list is usually above this sort of thing I am assuming
    that it was done without thinking through the potential results but really
    people, we should take care with comments like this because Moore's Law
    applies when you consider that rumours are amplified by tens of millions in
    the atmosphere of the web and that multiplies exponentially as the web
    grows!

    leslie/The power of sound
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Cottonwife" <cottonwife@cottonwife.com>
    To: "leslie shill" <icehouse@redshift.com>
    Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:46 AM
    Subject: RE: Re: 80s?

    > I am sorry, I told you, JUST CHILL :))))
    > I didn't really want to heart your feelings.
    > And I didn't want to attack you.
    >
    > But reading you huge text and some of your thoughts, I inderstood, there
    is
    > no need to explain something to you.
    > Once again sorry for pressing you and take care.
    >
    > P.S. Just as a remark, I wrote to you directly, not to the group. Just
    check
    > for some ethics tips. >))
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: leslie shill [mailto:icehouse@redshift.com]
    > Sent: 21. veebruar 2002. a. 4:23
    > To: Cottonwife
    > Cc: acid
    > Subject: Re: Re: 80s?
    >
    >
    > You can think what you like and say it as well, that does not matter to
    me!
    > The whole thing was connected to music and not having a name of a group
    does
    > not make it any less about music, I was responding to his criticism of a
    lot
    > of what takes place on the list, like the playlists or whats on my cd
    > player, these are things I enjoy about the list because they tell me what
    > people are listening to, and not just any people but more people who care
    > enough to make their opinions known and I like that! Anyway, to get back
    to
    > your inane comments and apparent lack of knowledge as to what is or is not
    > spamming, what you said was really just silly and simply an attack on me,
    > something I am able to deal with easily! In the 20 years that I have been
    a
    > DJ and for the 30 years that I have been involved in writing and
    performing
    > music I have come across many people who have misguided ideas and that is
    > what discussion groups are all about, this is a place to express an
    opinion
    > about music and related matters and there does NOT have to be a name of a
    > group to make it about music, can you understand that or do you need some
    > more help to understand the concept? I know that some people will be
    > interested in what I say and some will not appreciate it at all but that
    is
    > just fine by me, I am as interested in reading the negatives as I am in
    > reading the positives, too bad you are unable to understand this sort of
    > concept and your real response is to call me names, get a life cottonwife!
    >
    > leslie/The Power of Sound
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Cottonwife" <cottonwife@cottonwife.com>
    > To: <icehouse@redshift.com>
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:56 PM
    > Subject: RE: Re: 80s?
    >
    >
    > > nice shit man!!!
    > > I donat think 600 (or more) people want to read some freaks' comments!!!
    > > And I really can't understand, what message you wanted deliver to acid
    > jazz
    > > group. Where I can find a name of the group, or something, which is
    > > connected to music?
    > > YOu are a spammer, so
    > > just chill
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: icehouse@redshift.com [mailto:icehouse@redshift.com]
    > > Sent: 19. veebruar 2002. a. 19:29
    > > To: infophysix@yahoo.com
    > > Cc: acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
    > > Subject: Re: Re: 80s?
    > >
    > >
    > > =Casey,
    > >
    > > perhaps this list is too tame for you? If you want discussion then you
    > > need to at least try to make it happen instead of doing all your
    painting
    > > with a critical and sarcastic brush. It is true that there are other
    lists
    > > where some acid-jazz people now are found for whatever reasons but you
    > > will have to find them yourself Casey. I am sure that with you being as
    > > incredibly smart as you are you will have no problem locating anything
    you
    > > want on the internet, the trouble will probably come with the question
    of
    > > whether those lists want you and the acid and bile you seem to reflux at
    > > everything that is written here. Believe it or not, this list is not
    only
    > > for very specific discussion and it definitely is not for only what you
    > > define as being worthwhile as subject matter, while you may find
    playlists
    > > insipid, there are some people here who find them interesting. There are
    > > often discussions on subjects that I have no interest in and
    consequently
    > > I just ignore them, perhaps you can manage to do the same or else go
    find
    > > a board that has the sort of topics you want to discuss. The roadmaps
    that
    > > people take to get where they are is part of their history and it is
    > > interesting to some people here, again you can easily choose to ignore
    > > these threads. What music do you actually like and what are you
    listening
    > > to now, if anything at all? Instead of being super-critical why don't
    you
    > > offer the list something worthwhile in terms of discussion, there are
    > > people out here who will participate if you are able to generate
    something
    > > of interest, are you capable of that or are you just interested in the
    > > fight? There are many people here who want to know what other people are
    > > listening to and the "on my cd player" does fill that role, again if you
    > > cannot handle it then find some other list to hang your pointed little
    hat
    > > on!
    > >
    > > --
    > > This email was sent using Red Shift's webmail server.=
    > >
    > > infophysix@yahoo.com wrote:
    > > > --- Velanche Stewart <vstewart@calpoly.edu>
    > > > >
    > > > > >"Casey T." wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > > Yes, I'm interested in the music discussed on this
    > > > > > list. I'm not particularly interested on
    > > > > everyone
    > > > > > roadmap how they got here.
    > > >
    > > > > Perhaps it might be irrelevant to you, and that's
    > > > > fine.
    > > >
    > > > Yes, very irrelevant.
    > > >
    > > > > This is democracy in action, and I'm sure that there
    > > > may be others that agree with you.
    > > > > Judging by the number of responses so far,
    > > > > it's a topic that seems to hold value for others.
    > > >
    > > > You can find a knitwit to talk about anything, that
    > > > does necessarily mean it hold value towards the theme
    > > > of this list.
    > > >
    > > > Oh wait a minute what list is this again? I thought
    > > > it was the acid-jazz list but it seems like all the
    > > > messages are "In My Cd Changer" or "radio playlists".
    > > > Has the name of this list changed?
    > > >
    > > > Come to think of it, that's all I'm getting, that and
    > > > 80s. Has all the interesting people posting moved onto
    > > > another list? Let me know.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > __________________________________________________
    > > > Do You Yahoo!?
    > > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
    > > > http://sports.yahoo.com
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Feb 22 2002 - 04:16:57 CET