(Fwd) Re: ACid or REX ?Cubase Reason or ACID

From: Tom Giles (thomas.giles@st-annes.oxford.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 11:57:45 CET

  • Next message: Lars 'LB.' Behrenroth / BOC Productions: "live in show in 2 hours!"

    Acid is vey good and easy to use, however if you want depth &
    longevity from your products go the Cubase/Reason route. Also
    the next generation of Cubase is out there - Nuendo. Check it out
    on
    the steinberg webpage. its amazing! tom

    On 20 Jan 2002, at 9:19, mark givens wrote:

    From: "mark givens" <markeg@hotmail.com>
    To: ACID-JAZZ@UCSD.EDU
    Subject: ACid or REX ?Cubase Reason or ACID
    Date sent: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:19:32 +0000

    > dear list: There are two file formats and programs that are blowin
    > up in the desktop music world .Acidfiles by sonic foundry and
    > REXfile which is part of the REcycle (steinberg) system used with
    > Cubase and now Reason which is already highly touted. What it comes
    > down to is which of the three programs are best to buy ?Reason and
    > Cubase are somewhat cheaper than Acid until you add the cost of
    > Recycle in . The thing is all of the programs are deep and I intend
    > to use whichever one i get for a long time . I like working with
    > audio more than midi but I like chopping and timestretching as well.
    > Rexfiles are one way to chop and change the tempo of a sample and
    > Acid also has beatchopping and matching.Reason has virtual synth
    > and drum machines in addition to a rexfile player. well what do you
    > think?
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
    > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
    >

    ------- End of forwarded message -------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 12:10:42 CET