musicians vs. djs

Keith (kwillis@VMS1.GMU.EDU)
Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:51:12 -0500 (EST)


I've been reading this musician vs dj thread and it led to some serious
thinking on my part. It seems to me that it reflects an overall rift
amongst the jazzers. I know people who prefer the experimental sound as
opposed to the soulful sound with each side regarding their brand of a-j
as being the true type. Take for example someone who is very into the
Mo'Wax/Ninjatune thing might regard Incognito as a pop band and not truly
acid jazz while the Incognito fan might feel the same about Mo'Wax.

These problems are inevitable in a musical genre that encompasses as
diverse groups as DJ Krush, Jamiroquai, and the Chemical Brothers. These
sounds, to the untrained ear, seem entirely dissimilar. However, in many
ways this diversity is the music's appeal. We should all revel in the
idea of djs and musicians respecting eachother and collaborating where
possible.

As someone who definitely falls on the experimental/hip hop side of
things, I must agree with the original post that said we have gotten away
from live-instrument acid jazz and have moved into a new phase. I think
this is due in part to a string of strong experimental releases and a
string of weak live-instrument releases. However, this trend might be
reversed with the Greyboy Allstars and their California kin. I would love
to see more releases like that as opposed to the last Jamiroquai and
Incognito.

Just an opinion, flame me if you must

Keith
KWillis@vms1.gmu.edu