Re: jazz poll complaint

Jeff Slattery (slats@uclink3.berkeley.edu)
Wed, 22 Nov 1995 15:26:34 -0800 (PST)


add me to the list of dissenters to any opposition of posting acid-jazz
poll responses. i find the postings from individuals not only enlighting
as to what is out there in general, but reminding of what is in my own
collection that i have overlooked as possible poll entries, e.g. what it
is? and jhelisa.

yes, bandwidth is being filled, but it is quality in quantity, and as
such is justifiable. in addition, it is of a standard format, rather
than a simplistic "who's the best" debate, lending to a clear, concise,
and complete view.

like many of the finer things in life, "chill and enjoy".

keep the faith,
-slats

On Wed, 22 Nov 1995 george.v.williams@santafe.cc.fl.us wrote:

> not to specifically bash EK, (his message was just the one I
> randomly decided to respond to), but haven't we had enough
> of these darn acid jazz pools. For every good message about
> a new artist or arts in Europe I want to read about there
> are 10 acid jazz poll messages that I have to got through
> the hassle of deleteing of my schools network. The E-mail
> machines are 286's and it's a real hassle. I think we all
> have our own oppinions about what's good and what's not and
> we sure don't need magazine or other polls eating up
> valuable band width and hard drive space!
> Thanx, Peace,
> George.
>
>