Useless Waste Of Time Discussing Non-AJ music

Simon Brown (zcfbm25@ucl.ac.uk)
Tue, 02 Apr 1996 20:43:00 +0000

>I think this has proven to be rather open to
>the discussion of non- AJ for the most part, and I'm glad there
>haven't been any neg's posted -- and I hope this won't prompt it either.
>
>In short, this is a real positve for being on this list. I think it
>shows the level of sophistication shown by the list.

First Trip Hop, then Led Zeppelin (briefly), now easy listening; I could be
really negative and say, "stop talking about non-AJ music". But then I'd
have to define AJ (which has proved practically impossible in the past) and
then say why whatever we were discussing (Easy Hop?) wasn't what I'd
defined. And I'd probably be wrong.

I think that most of us have a vague idea about what AJ is but I think it
means different things to everybody. The reason that everyone is so positive
is that everyone's cool about music, we all love music and everyone has
experienced weird AJ type things in blatantly non-AJ music so we share it,
which is good. At last a kind of open-minded non-exclusive type of music
spreading peace, love and harmony.

How slushy! I'll just go and be sick!

Yours sincerely (with peace and love),

Simon Brown
s.j.brown@ucl.ac.uk
UCL Geology (2nd year)