Re: Live hip hop
Michael Bolotin (mlb6c@server1.mail.virginia.edu)
Sun, 27 Apr 1997 14:02:46 -0400 ()
>
> I realize I was a generalization when I posted, but I didn't want to get
> into a long reply. Of course there are exceptions to the rule. But I think
> that the majority of traditional hip-hop acts (2 emcees, dj) do not come
> off well in concert because they rely on their records and don't have a
> band backing them . I've been to several shows since the 80s and the Roots
> are the only act whose show didn't mimic their records. I think there is
> a shift towards improving live performances, but I still think that
> because of the level of complexity involved in its production
> (multiple samples, drum machines, keyboards, etc), hip-hop, like its
> cousins/offshoots, is music made more for the home system or car than the
> stage.
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
still, I think you are being overly judgemental here. I've seen both
De La Soul and Tribe come without a band, just using DJ's, and their
shows did not in the least mimic the albums. I seriously think that
you have just caught some poor preformers or preformances.
Sure, albums are the base of the music, and are imporant. Live music,
however, is what you need to see to fully appreciate the artists talent.
Just listening to the same songs, done in the same way over and over
again only does so much for you as a listener. I listen to tons and
tons of music, and I love doing so. When I haven't seen a live show in
a while, my interest in listening is dying. After seeing a great
show, I am completely rehyped on that music, and other music as well.
Nothing can compare to seeing a live show.