Re: Dj cam the sequel reply to tyler

Kevin Farnham (kevinf@dnai.com)
Sat, 05 Jul 1997 15:48:27 -0800


to whom it may concern,

> I have been quietly observing the tepid, yet ultimately impotent
> debate regarding the use of commercial "beats" in underground
> instrumental hip-hop, and the sophomoric dismissal of inspired but
> minimal production
> techniques as "lazy". Regarding the latter issue, it seems as if Mr.
> givens
> is approaching a highly complex musical form from a p.o.v. which is,
> quite frankly, intellectually "lazy". Mr. Givens, I suggest you go
> back
> and
> examine the roots of this music before you go any further in your
> senseless
> dissing of producers and material which is obviously beyond your
> earnest
> yet limited capacity for understanding. Remember:"the fool's arrogance
>
> is
> as the wooly coat of the wild goat, and is worn with the brazen pride
> from which the wise sheep hide."sucka.
>
> warmest personal regards,
>
> injex(presence)

injex:
i find your use of pretentious vocabulary and phrasing infuriating.
instead of dissing mark and ending your post with 'sucka' (very smooth),
why don't you enlighten us all as to how this is a 'highly complex
musical form' and tell us how the roots of this music has *anything* to
do with dj cam's production techniques.
i happen to enjoy cam's stuff and have been an avid hip hop fan for over
a decade, but would never come off sounding like this.
imho, you just come off sounding like an asshole.
why don't you come out with some education instead of coming out on the
prick tip.
maybe mark can then have something beyond an earnest yet limited
capacity for understanding.
k