FW: Grammies - Dance Catagory

Araya, Juan Carlos
Thu, 19 Feb 1998 08:47:32 -0500


Morales and radical in the same breath. Same old tired beats. What has
this world come to. This must be one of the signs of the end times. The
seventh seal.

Juano
jaraya@lucent.com


>----------
>From: kiveson@coombs.anu.edu.au[SMTP:kiveson@coombs.anu.edu.au]
>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 1998 12:35 AM
>To: acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
>Subject: Re: Grammies - Dance Catagory
>
>I think we need a crossover category for best country-house mixes...
>imagine Stand by Your Man with some doof ... doof .... doof ... doof ...
>doof .. ts .. doof .. ts .. doof .. ts ...
>
>But that's not gonna happen, is it? It's too radical for the Grammies,
>they have to stick to their tired old genres. That's the thing about
>Morales ... he's so radical, so ahead of his time, so prepared to cross
>boundaries just to keep the music alive..... So, my money's on Elson. ;-)
>
>have a nice weekend y'all
>
>Kboi
>
>
>>Elson Trinidad wrote: I don't think the Grammys are THAT blind. The Grammy
>>will
>>go to Armand Van
>>
>>> Helden (love him or hate him, and I lean towards the latter, 1997 *was*
>>> Armand's year (and even I can't argue with that)). If not him, then Todd
>>> Terry. I think Morales' nomination was a token one, simply cos he
>>>housefies
>>> anything and everything (Wasn't he the one who made the house version of
>>> the Leann Rimes song?)
>>>
>>> Elson
>>
>> elson, i have mad respect for you, but i throw down the gauntlet: i think
>>morales wins, hands down, precisely because of the leann rimes et al of the
>>world. friendly wager?
>>
>>-kevin k
>
>
>
>