THESE HARASSERS NAMES AND ADDRESSES ARE ON THE LAST 2 - 3 LINES OF THIS
MESSAGE FROM ME. I AM natladvnet@worldnet.att.net
Date:
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 11:36:41 -0500
From:
MANAGER DIRECTOR BOYKIN <natladvnet@worldnet.att.net>
To:
Acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
Subject:
RE: SPAMMING BY THE ATTACHED MESSENGER
Date:
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 11:22:27 -0500
From:
MANAGER DIRECTOR BOYKIN <natladvnet@worldnet.att.net>
Also RE:
Acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
List Manager:
When I got complaints about my ASKING IF I COULD SEND ANY PARTY
INTERESTED IN GETTING BUSINESS CARDS a message. (It was actualy just 3
-4 words in the Subject line and that was the extent of what I posted.)
(I LEFT IT OPEN TO WHERE IF A PARTY
WAS INTERESTED IN MY MESSAGE THEY COULD ACCESS IT - AND NOT HAVE IT
IMPOSED ON THEM. THEREFORE THOSE NOT INTERESTED IN MY MESSAGE WOULD NOT
GET IT IMPOSED ON THEM. THE SUBJECT LINE WITH ABOUT FOUR WORDS WAS ALL
THAT WAS SHOWN - no further message.
A REPLY WAS REQUIRED FOR THE MESSAGE TO BE SENT) YET THE ATTACHED PARTY
SAW THAT AS SPAMMING AND SET OFF SEVERAL COMPLAINTS AND THREATS. I'M
NOT DEBATING THAT IT WAS SPAM.
SO I SENT 2 REQUESTS TO BE UNSUBCRIBED, WHEN I GOT SEVERAL COMPLAINTS
AND FLAMES. THE FIRST REQUEST WAS SENT BACK TO ME AS NOT being
CLEAR AS TO WHAT I WAS REQUESTING; THE 2ND RESPONSE to me INDICATED THAT
I HAD BEEN UNSUBSCRIBED BASED ON THE REQUEST OF ANOTHER. FINE.
BUT WHAT DO YOU CALL THIS ATTACHED MESSAGE THAT ARRIVED IN MY MAILBOX IF
NOT...SPAMMING...TOO. THE MESSAGE IS NOT ABOUT ACID JAZZ AS NEITHER WAS
MINE. FURTHERMORE, THIS SPAMMED MESSAGE IS MEAN SPIRITED. MY MESSAGE
WAS POLITE, BRIEF AND CERTAINLY NOT HARASSING OR MEANSPIRITED AS THE
ATTACHED SPAMMED MESSAGE ATTEMPTING TO RIDICULE MY POLITE REQUEST TO
UNSUBSCRIBE. I, AT ALL TIMES, MAINTAINED POLITENESS EVEN TO THE
HARASSERS FLAMERS AND COMPLAINERS. I got their message and asked to be
unsubscribed although my message was claimed not to be clear until
someone else requested that I be unsubscribed. Whatever; all roads led
to Rome regardless.
ALL SPAMMED MESSAGES SHOULD GET THE SAME TREATMENT. THIS RIDICULING
MESSAGE DIRECTED AT ME TO MY MAILBOX IS WORSE THAN
SPAM BECAUSE IT SINGLES ME OUT. I DIDN'T SINGLE ANYONE OUT. IT IS MEAN
NASTY SPIRITED AND IT ARRIVED IN MY MAILBOX. I WAS TARGETED FOR
HARASSMENT. THEY HAD ALREADY GOTTEN ME UNSUBSCRIBED AND THAT SHOULD
HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT. NO, THIS DIDN'T SLAKE THEIR BLOOD LUST FOR
VENGEANCE. THEIR SELF RIGHTEOUS HOSTILITY DOES NOT JUSTIFY, AFTER
GETTING ME UNSUBCRIBED, THEN SAVING MY E-MAIL ADDRESS TO SPAM RIDICULE
TO ME. THIS IS NOT JUSTIFIED AT ALL. THEY HAD ALREADY EXERCISE THEIR
RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE AND DEFENSE AND REVENGE WHEN THEY REPORTED ME. NOW
THEIR SENDING RIDICULING MESSAGES TO ME GOES BEYOND WHAT THEY HAVE A
RIGHT TO DO OR WHAT THEY ARE JUSTIFIED IN DOING.
THESE PARTIES SHOULD BE CONTACTED BY YOU AND UNSUBSCRIBED FOR THEIR
BEHAVIOR. THIS WOULD BE BETTER TREATMENT THAN I RECEIVED WHEN THEY
COMPLAINED ABOUT ME, BUT AT NO RATE SHOULD THIS GO UNADDRESSED. NOW IF
THEY WANTED TO SEND COMPLAINTS TO ME PERSONALLY LIKE SOME PEOPLE DID
WHICH MADE ME DECIDE TO UNSUBSCRIBE, THEN THEY ARE NOT ALSO JUSTIFIED IN
REQUESTING THAT I BE UNSUBSCRIBED...AND...SEND HARASSING MAIL TO ME
TOO! NOTHING I DID WARRANTS ALL THESE VINDICTIVE SANCTIONS
PLUS...GETTING HARASSING MAIL FROM THEM TOO!
See the HARASSER(S') message SENT TO HARASS ME BELOW.
Subject:
Re: (no subject)
Date:
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 07:49:08 -0800 (PST)
From:
m o n k e y s e e <zookeeper@monkeysee.com>
To:
natladvnet@worldnet.att.net, Acid-jazz@ucsd.edu
At 7:13 AM -0500 2/20/98, MANAGER DIRECTOR BOYKIN wrote:
>unsubscribe me please - natladvnet@worldnet.att.net
hahahahahahahaah.....
//- chimp@monkeysee.com erik@bossanova.com -\\
//-www.monkeysee.com www.bossanova.com/erik-\\