BAO (tunde@arches.uga.edu)
Fri, 22 Oct 1999 18:50:14 -0400 (EDT)
It seems yall missed my second sentence, all music is good to talk about.
I was referring to thee fact that thee list is calleed acid jazz list,
and there is rarely any real acid jazz talk. In fact I dont listen to much
of any real acid jazz myself...at least not as much as before. And I dont
think that any dance music with jazz eleements falls under acid jazz just
my opinion.
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 NRahav@ixl.com wrote:
>
> i think this list covers a broad range of styles-
> we talk about hip hop, house, funk, rare groove, jazz, "acid" jazz, reggae,
> african, indian, d&b....
> I think the peeps on here maintain an open mind and a high level of
> appreciation for all things jazzy.... if you dont see that, then....hmm....
>
> funny too that you say this because you were the one who slammed some new
> jack for asking about Jamiroquai. (though I have to admit that was funny)
>
> .·´¯`·.¸¸.N·a·t.¸
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BAO [mailto:tunde@arches.uga.edu]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 10:15 AM
> To: Calvin Ho
> Cc: Elson Trinidad; Jason Mariyappan; NRahav@ixl.com; jflix@ifae.es;
> Acidjazz
> Subject: Re: Why Acid? Part II.
>
>
> that is true, there rarely is any real acid jazz music discussion. Is
> always about house and drum n bass. ALl music is good to talk about, but
> its just a bit weird.
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Calvin Ho wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >I recognize that, but IMHO, this is the *Acid Jazz* list and whatever
> gets
> > >serious discussion on this list
> > >becomes "acid-jazz" by circumstance whether it was meant to be or not.
> > >Perhaps
> > >its coincidental but it just so happens that whatever Gilles Peterson
> plays,
> > >it's stuff we're already talking about.
> >
> > Maybe the name of this list should change as times have changed.
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 23 1999 - 01:00:13 MET DST