Is there any way we can limit the incoming size at the server? I'm sure the
box at ucsd didn't really appreciate sending out that monster to 200+ people
either.
rm@c
Denise Benson wrote:
> ahhh,
>
> So this is where that annoying, 35 minutes to download, attachment was sent
> to. Obviously not a list member, thus not caring to abide by our little
> policies outta courtesy. I've written to complain, and imagine many of you
> have as well - any responses?
>
> -db-
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >I believed that there was a "no attachment policy" in this list. I
> >understand that, with modern technology and everything, this policy is
> >probably obsolete (and so are my computer and modem), but could you please
> >try to limit your attachments to smallish files and documents? (I just
> >received, or, rather, failed to receive, an 8MB message from "Euromusica",
> >and I think this is a little bit too much, modern technology
> >notwithstanding).
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Marco
>
> -denise benson-
>
> 'Mental Chatter' * Mondays 11am-2pm, CKLN 88.1FM (Toronto)
> (check us via RealAudio: http://ckln.sac.ryerson.ca)
> 'Glide' * Wednesdays @ Gypsy Co-op, 817 Queen St. W.
> 'Soleil' * Fridays alongside dj Sassa'le @ Fez batik, 129 Peter St.
> Writer * Exclaim Mag. & Eye Weekly ('Extended Play') + more
> Music Editor * The People Have Spoken (TPHS) magazine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 19:09:30 MET DST