At 05:37 PM 2/9/01 -0500, adario wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
> >Also, why the heck does everyone consider instrumentals to not be "real
> >songs"? If it's got
>did i say that?
I dunno, but a couple people have mentioned how they prefer "real" songs to
instrumentals-- just throws my head for a loop, really--
>i do think it's funny that you refer her voice as "vocals",
>as if hefner chopped it up like tobin's regular chickens. her "voice" is
>clearly a unifying melody, where "vocals" seems more like a producers'
>concept of a sonic fragment.
I can pull out a jazz album from the fifties & it'll say "Peggy Lee--
vocals" on the back; so I really have no idea where you get that "vocals"
just means chopped up voice fragments
>also, it's kinda hard to slip actual lyrics
>into an instrumental. especially words as eloquent as those of residue.
Yes, but just because a song doesn't have words does not mean it isn't a
song, which is really my only point-- I'll just drop it, as my notion of
logic seems to be kind of alien to one & all in this particular instance, 'kay?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 10 2001 - 00:08:30 CET