Re: Re: Dissent

From: m.pallorina (spunkyspud@couchpotatoes.ph)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2001 - 01:40:56 CEST

  • Next message: m.pallorina: "Re: Re: Bomb the Dissent; Re: hip hop top 10 / in my case"

    stephanie wrote:

    >Wouldn't it be nice
    >to be able to, for example, watch both commercials and
    >independent film, with no baggage, and be able to
    >observe them both purely for content, not intent?
    >Almost impossible for me, but rewarding when I can
    >pull it off.

    but how else can we know if the film failed or not if we don't compare its intent with its actual content? what it sets out to do might be noble, but if it does not achieve it, then it's a fluke. meanwhile, it can be salvaged if the audience picks up something that is worthwhile from it, even though it wasn't part of the original intent. but then again, if its intent is to get loads of money from the box office and it succeeds -- then, well, it's a commercially successful film :)

    meanwhile, it's hard to compare indies and commercial films, and to judge them purely on content, because it's their intent that spells out the difference between them big time.

    i don't really know if any of this is related to acid jazz or music as a whole! just putting in my two cents' worth :)

    have a good day everyone!

    -----------
    misha d. pallorina
    philippines

    __________________________________
    www.edsamail.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 12 2001 - 01:55:33 CEST