At 3:46 PM -0700 7/23/01, milkweed wrote:
>i still think both is best.
>why strive for one of the two when both are attainable?
>the only reason i see for not working on skills is laziness.
>i'm not trying to call people w/o extrodinary skills lazy, just those
>who don't work on thier skills and say "selection is all thats
>important".
There's raw song selection, then there's *flow/sequence*, which isn't
really "skillz", then there's skillz.
I'll take a DJ w/the first 2 who's skipping his needle every once in
while over most any skillzentric DJ. Look at Mancuso for a great
example of what I'm talking about. I'd calibrate the importance for
my ears as follows: song selection: 8; sequence/flow: 9; skillz: 4.
On a scale of one to-- say, 12.
--Jason Witherspoon ICQ #62837760
--------- ----O---- --- --- --- --- ----O---- ---------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 01:52:17 CEST