('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
Are they really that bad?
When I make a cd, the mp3s burned are typically compressed at 192 -- uncompressed during the burning process.... that's the standard isn't it? Playing in my car stereo, home stero, walkman, compared w/ the retail music, I've never been able to differentiate the two...
perhaps it's because I've never played an mp3 sourced compact disc in a club.. or, maybe mp3s your playing are compressed at 96.... of course that's gonna sound like shit.
What about other compression rates? 320.. 256..? VBR -- I think that's what it's called... you know, the one that alternates the bit rate as it looks like the compression is flickering between 128 and 320... supposedly that one has the best sound...
playing right now, at an extremely high volume: trouser jazz by mr. scruff, compressed at 192...
sounds great!
> > MP3s may sound ok on a smaller sound system, but
> > they sound for crap when
> > played on a nice system, unless they have been
> > ripped at a high bitrate.
>
> there's still some sonic funkiness because of the
> compression even at the higher bitrates. i have a
> friend that burns cds for gigs from a lot of d/l'ed
> stuff (he's a cd dj) and he's trying to figure out how
> to overcome the sound ishs.
>
> > Pioneer's new MP3 player is pretty cool,
> > though...but I'm sticking with my
> > CDJ 1000s and my Technics 1500 for now. By the way,
> > that pic of "Donnie
> > Darkwave" cracked me up. Sure, those Ipods can hold
> > lots of songs, but what
> > happens when some drunken idiot saunters over to his
> > setup, yaks it up with
> > our hero...and then while walking away, snags one of
> > the wires, yanking
> > those precious IPods to their doom? I can just see
> > one of those things
> > shattering into millions of pieces. Hell, one
> > spilled drink could wipe out
> > half his library. Technology is so fragile these
> > days...
>
> that mixer looked like a vestax pmc 05pro. do you
> think donnie works on his crab skratches?
>
> > The "anyone can be a DJ" line amused me as well.
> > True, mixing isn't
> > everything (just ask Gilles Peterson), but most
> > people couldn't program a
> > set to save their lives.
>
> even as a member of the trick(y) mixing fraternity, i
> have to contend that 99% of dj'ing is in set
> progression--mixing, scratching and their descendants
> are for transitions, and/or personalizing the records
> in the set. even w/o mixing NOT EVERYONE CAN BE A
> DJ!!
>
> > Most "DJs" I've seen these
> > days are spinning
> > trance because it's (for the most part) brainless
> > music and it's easy to
> > mix....THUMP THUMP THUMP THUMP THUMP THUMP....bah, I
> > say!
> > Just my humble opinion...
>
> while i'm no fan of trance, i think that you're being
> a little unfair. deep house is easy to mix, and it's
> not as fast as trance. so why do people really spin
> trance? crowd response. it's the same reason that a
> dj that plays all your favorite musical, underground,
> groovy hiphop when you walk in the club, will at
> peaktime switch to the jiggy...
>
> -t
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 31 2002 - 21:24:03 CEST