Re: does rock still rock?

From: Elson Trinidad (elson@westworld.com)
Date: Fri May 26 2000 - 02:40:03 MET DST

Next message: Wm. ERROL PACE: "RE: Off Topic//New topic"

Previous message: Jason Martin: "RE: Off Topic"
In reply to: philipm@isd.canberra.edu.au: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Next in thread: Jason Witherspoon: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Next in thread: BARONI@humnet.ucla.edu: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

philipm@isd.canberra.edu.au wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2000 BARONI@humnet.ucla.edu wrote:
>
> > >>Is Chemical Bros considered rock?
> > >
> > >No. They're "Stadium Techno".
>
> > Great definition!
>
> get real, the chemicals brothers, fatboy shit and the rest of the big beat
> breaks whaterver it is are absolutely nothing to do with techno
> whatsoever. go listen to some derrick may them some chemical bros. any
> similarity? though not.

Define "techno," then.

- 30 -

:. elson trinidad, los angeles, california, usa :. elson@westworld.com :. www.westworld.com/~elson

"Ever notice no one uses the term 'Information Superhighway' anymore"?

Next message: Wm. ERROL PACE: "RE: Off Topic//New topic"
Previous message: Jason Martin: "RE: Off Topic"
In reply to: philipm@isd.canberra.edu.au: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Next in thread: Jason Witherspoon: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Next in thread: BARONI@humnet.ucla.edu: "Re: does rock still rock?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 26 2000 - 02:43:53 MET DST