On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, mark givens wrote:
> Dear List":
> There is a lot of talk about jungle; To quote Bono from the Live at
> red rocks album", maybe.. maybe too much talk." Some people think it
> and techno will be the next big thing . This is never going to happen
> much as i like Jungle. heres why 1
> Too fast- yanks will never buy anything that goes at 160 Bpms. in fact
> the peak is about 135 and thats fast for the avg radio station.
> Dazzy Dukes( bass) is up there at that level but higher than that, mix
> show maybe ;top ten never. 2
> lacks songs: Inner City life almost had a song but that as close as it
> gets uin junle unless they remix brandy. Lacks
> regional/racial base- house has a core folowing gays , people from
> chicago; miami bass has a black/southern core; rap had a core before
> it blew up. Jungle? its from the U.K. and in the states its a white rave
> thing. A base gives you an irreducible core that will keep the stuff
> viab;le as it goes in and out of fashion on the charts. Between gold
> sincles bass still sells month in month out to its core. Bass will break
> big before jungle and stay around. By the way Gangtsa/playya rap,
> with its southern/west coast core will always be with us on some
> level theyve even got their own magazine s and indie labels. This stuff
> will never die like it or not. My own thing has been to
> take jungle production methods chopped breaks, bass hits, stuttered drum
> and rolls, add party chants a la gogo and bass and make slow jungle at
> 120-135 bpms . By the way there is a Baltimore scene centered around
> the Paradox club and v103 mix shows that is pretty dope. the songs are
> repetitve the chants sex and drug inspired but its fresh . DOO DOO
> Brown!!!! markeg@hotmail.com
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>