Re: Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002

From: _dakati _ (dakati@postmaster.co.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 19 2002 - 03:56:00 CET

Next message: leslie shill: "Re: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002"

Previous message: _dakati _: "[acid-jazz] intosomethin newsletter"
Maybe in reply to: Stimp: "Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002"
Next in thread: Stimp: "Re: Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002/Pearl Jam"
Reply: Stimp: "Re: Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002/Pearl Jam"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) I'm gonna have to go the other way and disagree with you on this... Far from 'formulaic', in my opinion, this was one of my favorite records of the year -- seeing them live in a small club a few weeks back only cemented that belief... Worlds apart from the first three, it's not even same band.... they're changin', changin'....

different strokes I guess...

> > > > -Pearl Jam: Riot Act (If you own any of their first 3 records, you
> > > > already
> > > > know what to expect. Stale formulaic rock)

Next message: leslie shill: "Re: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002"
Previous message: _dakati _: "[acid-jazz] intosomethin newsletter"
Maybe in reply to: Stimp: "Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002"
Next in thread: Stimp: "Re: Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002/Pearl Jam"
Reply: Stimp: "Re: Fw: [acid-jazz] Best/Worst/merely Blah of 2002/Pearl Jam"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 19 2002 - 04:00:02 CET