[acid-jazz] Censors and Ideological Pitbulls: Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves

From: Bob Davis (earthjuice_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 2003-05-15 08:11:05

  • Next message: John Book: "Re: [acid-jazz] Censors and Ideological Pitbulls: Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves"

    This might just be the best thing yet that I have read concerning Clear Channel!
    I realize that for some of you this falls into the category known as "white folks binnis".
    However always keep in mind that Clear Channel is the owner of most of the "so called" Black
    radio stations in the United Stares....
    They represent in my mind a "Clear and Present Danger"
    -------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.counterpunch.org/landau05132003.html

    CounterPunch

    May 13, 2003

    Censors and Ideological Pitbulls:
    Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves

    By Saul Landau

    Swiss novelist Max Frisch described technology as "the knack
    of so arranging a world that we need not experience it."
    Since Frisch died in 1991, just before the "information age"
    reached its commercial maturity, he missed some zany
    interpretations of his wisdom. Greg Collins, a senior vice
    president of Reynolds and Reynolds Company, offers his
    understanding of Frisch in Ward's Dealer Business, Feb 1,
    2003.

    "Unfortunately," Collins laments, "many businesses still
    approach technology from the 'Industrial Age' mentality of
    days past." Collins' future orientation refers to
    businessmen using technology to improve business processes,
    not just to reduce their labor force. "Once the truth is
    known, it's remarkable how effective people, processes and
    technology can be" at enhancing corporate profits. Frisch
    turns uneasily in his grave. Truth and corporate profits go
    together like Tabasco sauce on vanilla ice cream. Indeed,
    modern corporations profit from massive fabrication about
    the products they peddle just as media giants make money
    from lying in the hourly "news" reports they scream at us.
    Indeed, we have become accustomed to listening to lies
    masquerading as truth. Each day we receive thousands of
    commercial, political and religious "messages" designed to
    make us do or buy something we don't need to do or buy.

    I shake my head in confusion just from living in this Mother
    of all Information ages. If I turn my radio dial from
    classical music to "all news when it happens," I receive
    machine gun blasts of mis and dis-information. From the TV,
    radio, newspapers, billboards and computer emerge
    manipulative words, pictures, (spam) sounds and symbols
    aimed at converting my organism into an advanced purchasing
    instrument. No one has yet invented the equivalent of the
    bullet proof vest for the brain, to protect against the
    cartridges of blather fired at our cerebral cortex.

    I assume advertisers and news fabricators (those who invent
    the lies and those who report them) count on rapid temporal
    atrophy among the receivers of false information. While the
    US military still zealously searches Iraq for even a faint
    trace of a weapon of mass destruction or the scantiest Al
    Qaeda connection to Saddam Hussein, I can actually feel my
    brain filter growing overtaxed with bullpucky. Terrorism,
    orange alerts, snipers, SARS! Who said what, when, where?
    Huh? How much of my pension did I lose in the market today?
    Will I still have my job when I get to work? The messages of
    anxiety penetrate beyond any "facts."

    The pushers of commodities, services and ideology have
    certainly used technology to arrange the world -- not
    satisfactorily mind you -- into commercially designed
    messages. Digital media beams them by radio and TV waves to
    your living room, bedroom, bathroom, as well as to your
    favorite restaurant, bar and car.

    The highway designers must factor billboards into their
    master environmental plans. Who notices if the messages
    clash violently with the trees and sky? Gaudy poster art,
    duplicated by advanced modern copying techniques, distracts
    the driver with prurient sales offers of products ranging
    from "gentlemen's clubs" to lite beer. These unsightly
    sights merge with the car radio reverberations of ultra
    right wing political and religious patter.

    A man with a baritone voice claims to know Jesus Christ
    personally. "Give Jesus Christ a chance," he exhorts his
    listeners. He wants all of us to experience the born-again
    Christian rapture like the Republican who occupies the White
    House. The radio missionary sounds serious. The radio
    station owners are very serious -- about undertaking the
    Lord's work and seeking ever greater profits (market
    shares). Take the Clear Channel radio stations. On the air,
    they offer super dumbed-down religiously tinged versions of
    reality. Off the air, in their corporate boardrooms, the
    media executives engage in very sophisticated business
    practices. The hard-rock material foundations for
    broadcasting church sermons come replete with off-the-air
    business conspiracies. On the air: Simplify life for the
    listeners. Turn to Jesus! Vote Republican! Wave the flag!

    Clear Channel literally fogs the airwaves with ultra right
    slogans that appeal to the fundamentalist white, Christian
    soldiers of God. Now, shudder, Clear Channel plans to
    capture the Spanish speaking radio audience as well. They
    await only a tiny change of rules by the Federal
    Communications Commission (FCC). Clear Channel expects the
    FCC to approve its nearly $2.5 billion deal that would,
    according to Eric Boehlert in the April 24, 2003Salon, "link
    the Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation, the leader in
    Spanish-language radio stations in the U.S., and Univision
    Communications -- already the market leader in
    Spanish-language TV, cable and music." This new entity
    "would create a new company that controls nearly 70 percent
    of Spanish-language advertising revenue in the United
    States." Currently, Clear Channel owns 26 percent of
    Hispanic Broadcasting.

    Univision uses formula programming, flag-waving news and
    public affairs shows, stale music templates remixed with
    electronic technology and very loud commercials. Put
    together two financial powerhouses in their world of
    programming mediocrity and you have an ideal vehicle for
    Messianic Republican propaganda.

    Boehlart recalls that "President Bush even gave Univision
    his first national television interview following his
    inauguration. More recently, congressional Democrats have
    grumbled over Univision's fawning coverage of Miguel
    Estrada, the conservative -- and controversial -- judge
    recently nominated by Bush to serve on the U.S. Court of
    Appeals." Clear Channel stations openly advocate for
    Republican causes. Indeed, one Democratic member of Congress
    recently accused Clear Channel of blatantly skewing its war
    coverage to favor the administration. Like the bombastic
    Rush Limbaugh of the EIB media conglomerate, Clear Channel
    has no apologies. Its executives proudly stand for the
    values of George W. Bush.

    But while Clear Channel talk show hosts and preachers pound
    away at "family values," the corporate executives practice
    their shark-like business plans. Family values in business
    means that they expect FCC chair Michael Powell will behave
    with the same servile values as his father, the servile
    Secretary of State. They observed how the once dignified
    Colin Powell bowed and scraped before the calumnies of his
    imperial masters in foreign policy; so they expect his son
    to cater to the needs of the right wing media oligopoly who
    helped finance Bush's campaigns. Under Michael Powell's
    tutelage, the FCC has already proposed new rules to
    "deregulate" the dangerous near monopoly of TV and radio
    ownership. If adopted, the new rules would tighten the
    already strong hold that the five monster conglomerates have
    over TV and radio networks.

    Clear Channel executives expect the FCC to reinterpret the
    "public interest" to mean a near monopoly over TV and radio
    for their stations along with their ideological pal Rupert
    Murdoch's Fox network, the electronic and defense titan
    General Electric and the CNN patriots. Imagine these sources
    as the "information" providers for the majority of
    Americans. According to Boehlart, Clear Channel "took
    advantage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996" to grow
    from "40 stations then to approximately 1,200 stations
    today, or roughly 970 more than its closest competitor."

    If you're frightened by these figures, you've reacted
    correctly. While liberals and progressives debate morality
    and justice, the extreme right wing media moguls muscularly
    push their simplistic nativism on the TV and radio waves and
    seek ever more space to reach out with their revealed word
    sandwiched of course between commercial messages so that
    ever more Americans will get the messianic virus.
    Politically, Clear Channel and Univision represent the
    neo-conservative-fundamentalist Christian world view in both
    the ideological and business sense.

    Their power extends beyond politics, however. In Latin
    music, Univision or Clear Channel can promote "their hits"on
    "their stations." According to Boehlart, Clear Channel also
    owns "37 television stations, 770,000 billboards and
    unmatched lists of venues, promoters and tours to exert
    control over the concert industry. Last year the company
    sold 30 million concert tickets, or 26 million more than its
    closest competitor."

    With this kind of material power, Clear Channel can unleash
    its ideological pit bulls on the air. Talk show host Glenn
    Beck sponsored "Rallies for America" as Bush sought signs of
    public backing for his impending war to counter antiwar
    rallies that had successfully received some news coverage.
    Clear Channel not only acted as impresario for the pro war
    demonstrations, but heavily promoted these boring events on
    its radio stations.

    Boehlart reports that with Clear Channel approval one Denver
    disc jockey "suggested that then antiwar Vermont Governor
    Dean should be shot. Musicians got the political message
    Clear Channel was sending. During a speech at the National
    Press Club last week, actor and outspoken antiwar activist
    Tim Robbins told reporters, 'A famous middle-aged
    rock-and-roller called me last week to thank me for speaking
    out against the war, only to go on to tell me that he could
    not speak himself because he fears repercussions from Clear
    Channel.' 'They promote our concert appearances,' he said.
    'They own most of the stations that play our music. I can't
    come out against this war.'"

    Can watching TV produced by such intimidators lead to
    creativity? Watching for a few hours, I concluded that my
    undergraduate students make more interesting telenovelas
    than the Spanish language soaps on Univision. The
    programming that Latinos receive and what they will get in
    the near future as Clear Channel and Univision perform their
    kinky business marriage may make the "Jerry Springer Show"
    and "Cheaters" seem highly intellectual.

    Highbrows may sneer at TV in general or claim that they
    watch only PBS yawn but this will not defeat the tasteless
    and "friendly fascism" (as Bertram Gross called it in his
    1982 book by that name) of our age. Media moguls have used
    technology to arrange values to suit their commercial
    proclivities: want what you don't need; need what you don't
    want; salute and wave the flag and give what's left of your
    mind to Jesus and George W. Bush. Yes, Max Frisch died
    before technology had rearranged the media world so as to
    completely vitiate experience.

    ---
    Saul Landau's film IRAQ: VOICES FROM THE STREETS is
    distributed by Cinema Guild, 800-723-5522. He teaches at Cal
    Poly Pomona University and is a fellow of the Institute for
    Policy Studies. He can be reached at: landau_at_counterpunch.org
    Copyright (c) 2003 CounterPunch. All Rights Reserved.