>any performer can decide whether they wish to be artists or entertainers,
>and we should not get on their backs for choosing to be entertainers,
>however, they should be called entertainers and not artists.
Isn't this a little bit tricky? Probably, Esquivel, Martin Denny, Brian
Wilson, even Otis Redding, considered themselves entertainers, but I would
say they were great artists...
And -- is there a clear cut boundary between art and entertainment?
Regards,
Marco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 11 2000 - 00:20:08 MET DST